8800 GTS 512 vs 8800 Ultra

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

8800 Ultra
1.66
+12.9%

8800 Ultra outperforms 8800 GTS 512 by 13% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking895938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.030.04
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG80G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2007 (16 years old)11 December 2007 (16 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $349
Current price$235 (0.3x MSRP)$146 (0.4x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

8800 GTS 512 has 33% better value for money than 8800 Ultra.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128128
CUDA cores612no data
Core clock speed612 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors681 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rate39.2 billion/sec41.60
Floating-point performance387.1 gflops416.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHz1640 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s52.48 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800 Ultra 1.66
+12.9%
8800 GTS 512 1.47

8800 Ultra outperforms 8800 GTS 512 by 13% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

8800 Ultra 642
+13%
8800 GTS 512 568

8800 Ultra outperforms 8800 GTS 512 by 13% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.66 1.47
Recency 2 May 2007 11 December 2007
Cost $829 $349
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 135 Watt

The GeForce 8800 Ultra is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTS 512 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 22 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.