FirePro M4150 vs GRID M40
Aggregated performance score
GRID M40 outperforms FirePro M4150 by 74% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 636 | 798 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.42 | 0.31 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GM107 | Opal |
| Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 (7 years ago) | 16 October 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Current price | $484 | $170 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GRID M40 has 35% better value for money than FirePro M4150.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,870 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 33.06 | 17.16 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 549.1 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on GRID M40 and FirePro M4150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 4.25 | 2.44 |
| Recency | 18 May 2016 | 16 October 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
The GRID M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4150 in performance tests.
Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
