RTX A1000 Mobile vs FirePro V5900

Place in performance ranking	703	221
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.15	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Cayman	GA107
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2011 (13 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$89	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2048
Core clock speed	600 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	19.20	72.96
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro V5900 and RTX A1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	230 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9−10 −656%	68 +656%
1440p	3−4 −800%	27 +800%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.26	23.07
Recency	24 May 2011	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	95 Watt