Quadro FX 5800 vs FirePro V5900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro V5900
2011
2 GB GDDR5
3.28
+3.8%

FirePro V5900 outperforms Quadro FX 5800 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking700709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.150.60
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCaymanGT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 May 2011 (12 years old)11 November 2008 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,499
Current price$89 $157 (0x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro V5900 has 92% better value for money than FX 5800.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512240
Core clock speed600 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt189 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2048.80
Floating-point performance614.4 gflops622.1 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length230 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V5900 3.28
+3.8%
FX 5800 3.16

FirePro V5900 outperforms Quadro FX 5800 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V5900 1269
+3.8%
FX 5800 1223

FirePro V5900 outperforms Quadro FX 5800 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.28 3.16
Recency 24 May 2011 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 189 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro V5900 and Quadro FX 5800.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 47 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.