Tahiti vs Baffin
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Baffin and Tahiti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 510 | 511 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
GPU code name | Baffin | Tahiti |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2048 |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 4,313 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
ROPs | 16 | 32 |
TMUs | 64 | 128 |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 (5.1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 (1.2) |
Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.170 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.13 | 8.10 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Baffin has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Baffin and Tahiti.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.