Intel Arc Graphics 140T: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Arc Graphics 140T provides acceptable gaming and benchmark performance at 13.18% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 5090 D.
Contents
Summary
Intel started Arc Graphics 140T sales 6 January 2025. This is a Xe+ architecture notebook card primarily aimed at gamers.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Arc Graphics 140T: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 385 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Arc Graphics 140T's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Arc Graphics 140T's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | of 24064 (RTX PRO 6000) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Arc Graphics 140T: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Shared memory | + | |
| Resizable BAR | + |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Arc Graphics 140T. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Send your test results of Arc Graphics 140T.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Arc Graphics 140T is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 47 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 48 | |
| Fortnite | 75−80 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | |
| Valorant | 110−120 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 45 | |
| Fortnite | 75−80 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 29 | |
| Metro Exodus | 27−30 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40 | |
| Valorant | 110−120 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 40 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40 |
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 75−80 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24 | |
| Metro Exodus | 16−18 | |
| Valorant | 140−150 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 30−33 |
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27 | |
| Metro Exodus | 10−11 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20 | |
| Valorant | 70−75 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14 |
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
