RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
13.44

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms Arc Graphics 140T by a whopping 405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores814080
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,151
Floating-point processing powerno data73.69 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.34 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 13.44
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 67.93
+405%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T 5634
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 28467
+405%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−400%
250−260
+400%
1440p23
−378%
110−120
+378%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−361%
350−400
+361%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Sons of the Forest 27−30
−381%
130−140
+381%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−361%
350−400
+361%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Far Cry 5 48
−400%
240−250
+400%
Fortnite 75−80
−349%
350−400
+349%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−391%
280−290
+391%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−388%
210−220
+388%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Sons of the Forest 27−30
−381%
130−140
+381%
Valorant 110−120
−374%
550−600
+374%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−361%
350−400
+361%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−405%
950−1000
+405%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Far Cry 5 45
−389%
220−230
+389%
Fortnite 75−80
−349%
350−400
+349%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−391%
280−290
+391%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−388%
210−220
+388%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−383%
140−150
+383%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Sons of the Forest 27−30
−381%
130−140
+381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
−392%
290−300
+392%
Valorant 110−120
−374%
550−600
+374%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Far Cry 5 40
−400%
200−210
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−391%
280−290
+391%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Sons of the Forest 27−30
−381%
130−140
+381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−400%
150−160
+400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−349%
350−400
+349%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−390%
500−550
+390%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Valorant 140−150
−393%
700−750
+393%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−400%
190−200
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−400%
150−160
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−385%
160−170
+385%
Sons of the Forest 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−400%
150−160
+400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Valorant 75−80
−367%
350−400
+367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Sons of the Forest 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 400% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 378% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.44 67.93
Recency 6 January 2025 18 March 2025

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has a 405.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140T in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.