Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T with Radeon PRO WX 3100, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
13.45
+119%

Arc Graphics 140T outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking399611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.43
Power efficiencyno data7.21
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataLexa
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)12 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speedno data925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data39.01
Floating-point processing powerno data1.248 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache8 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 13.45
+119%
PRO WX 3100 6.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T Samples: 7 5634
+119%
PRO WX 3100 Samples: 337 2578

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 140T 12445
+237%
PRO WX 3100 3691

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 140T 55018
+370%
PRO WX 3100 11702

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 140T 8697
+226%
PRO WX 3100 2671

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140T 51104
+176%
PRO WX 3100 18522

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140T 517962
+194%
PRO WX 3100 176357

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+229%
14
−229%
1440p23
+130%
10−12
−130%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data14.21
1440pno data19.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Far Cry 5 48
+140%
20−22
−140%
Fortnite 75−80
+105%
35−40
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+117%
21−24
−117%
Valorant 110−120
+63.4%
70−75
−63.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+82.5%
100−110
−82.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Far Cry 5 45
+125%
20−22
−125%
Fortnite 75−80
+105%
35−40
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+117%
21−24
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+375%
12
−375%
Valorant 110−120
+63.4%
70−75
−63.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Far Cry 5 40
+100%
20−22
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+117%
21−24
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+343%
7
−343%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+105%
35−40
−105%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+113%
45−50
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Valorant 140−150
+103%
70−75
−103%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+245%
10−12
−245%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+120%
14−16
−120%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Valorant 75−80
+134%
30−35
−134%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and PRO WX 3100 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is 229% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140T is 130% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T performs better in 59 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.45 6.15
Recency 6 January 2025 12 June 2017

Arc Graphics 140T has a 118.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 years.

The Arc Graphics 140T is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 64 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or Radeon PRO WX 3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.