Arc Graphics 140T vs Arc Graphics 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Arc Graphics 140T, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc Graphics 130T outperforms Arc Graphics 140T by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 365 | 390 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | Xe+ (2025) |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 50−55
+6.4%
| 47
−6.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−35
−25.8%
|
39
+25.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+13%
|
75−80
−13%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+10.3%
|
27−30
−10.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−35
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+10%
|
60−65
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+13%
|
75−80
−13%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+10.3%
|
27−30
−10.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+6.3%
|
48
−6.3%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+10.3%
|
75−80
−10.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+10.3%
|
55−60
−10.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+11.6%
|
40−45
−11.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+14%
|
50−55
−14%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+7.8%
|
110−120
−7.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−35
+19.2%
|
26
−19.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+10%
|
60−65
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+13%
|
75−80
−13%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 200−210
+8%
|
180−190
−8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+10.3%
|
27−30
−10.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+13.3%
|
45
−13.3%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+10.3%
|
75−80
−10.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+10.3%
|
55−60
−10.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+11.6%
|
40−45
−11.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+100%
|
29
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+14%
|
50−55
−14%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40
−13.9%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+7.8%
|
110−120
−7.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−35
+24%
|
25
−24%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+10%
|
60−65
−10%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+10.3%
|
27−30
−10.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+27.5%
|
40
−27.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+10.3%
|
55−60
−10.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+14%
|
50−55
−14%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40
−13.9%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 85−90
+10.3%
|
75−80
−10.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
+11.8%
|
100−110
−11.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+13.6%
|
21−24
−13.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+11.8%
|
16−18
−11.8%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
+8.3%
|
140−150
−8.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+13.2%
|
35−40
−13.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+13.3%
|
30−33
−13.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+11.8%
|
30−35
−11.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 30−35
+13.3%
|
30−33
−13.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+13.3%
|
75−80
−13.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 130T and Arc Graphics 140T compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is 6% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 100% faster.
- in Baldur's Gate 3, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 26% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 58 tests (97%)
- Arc Graphics 140T is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
