RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Arc Graphics 130T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130T with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130T
2025
16.04

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms Arc Graphics 130T by a whopping 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiencyno data8.46
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores724064
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,968
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130T 16.04
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+345%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130T 6381
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+345%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Dead Island 2 60−65
−333%
260−270
+333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−333%
290−300
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Dead Island 2 60−65
−333%
260−270
+333%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Fortnite 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−339%
250−260
+339%
Valorant 120−130
−337%
550−600
+337%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−333%
290−300
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−339%
900−950
+339%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Dead Island 2 60−65
−333%
260−270
+333%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Fortnite 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−341%
260−270
+341%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−339%
250−260
+339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−329%
180−190
+329%
Valorant 120−130
−337%
550−600
+337%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−333%
290−300
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Dead Island 2 60−65
−333%
260−270
+333%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−339%
250−260
+339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−329%
180−190
+329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−335%
500−550
+335%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Valorant 150−160
−343%
700−750
+343%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−332%
190−200
+332%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−329%
120−130
+329%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Valorant 85−90
−307%
350−400
+307%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Dead Island 2 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−341%
75−80
+341%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.04 71.35
Recency 6 January 2025 18 March 2025

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a 344.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130T in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130T is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.