RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Arc A770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Arc A770M
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
39.68
+16.4%

Arc A770M outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by a moderate 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking98142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe HPG (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameAlchemistno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt (120 - 150 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate422.4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A770M and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 39.68
+16.4%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 34.08

Arc A770M outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A770M 37375
+29.6%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 28847

Arc A770M outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 30% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A770M 25563
+24.3%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20571

Arc A770M outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 24% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A770M 124487
+50.7%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612

Arc A770M outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 51% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
1440p57
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
4K37
+23.3%
30−35
−23.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 113
+18.9%
95−100
−18.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+28%
100−105
−28%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+16.5%
85−90
−16.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%
Hitman 3 95−100
+16.5%
85−90
−16.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 176
+17.3%
150−160
−17.3%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+18.8%
85−90
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 256
+21.9%
210−220
−21.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+28%
100−105
−28%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Far Cry 5 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%
Hitman 3 95−100
+16.5%
85−90
−16.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+25%
120−130
−25%
Metro Exodus 95
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
+16.7%
120−130
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
+23.6%
140−150
−23.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+16.7%
90−95
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 85
+21.4%
70−75
−21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+24%
75−80
−24%
Hitman 3 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Far Cry 5 81
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 82
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+21.3%
80−85
−21.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+24%
50−55
−24%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Metro Exodus 50
+25%
40−45
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

This is how Arc A770M and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 19% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 27% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 23% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.68 34.08
Recency 30 March 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 115 Watt

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 86 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.