Radeon RX 7900M vs Arc A550M

Place in the ranking	223	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.39	22.54
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-512	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2022 (2 years ago)	19 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4608
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2090 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	262.4	601.9
Floating-point processing power	8.397 TFLOPS	38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	192
TMUs	128	288
Tensor Cores	256	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	16	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A550M 24.51

RX 7900M 58.37
+138%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A550M 14350

RX 7900M 50241
+250%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A550M 5830

RX 7900M 19434
+233%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65−70 −151%	163 +151%
1440p	50−55 −148%	124 +148%
4K	35−40 −160%	91 +160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−131%

90−95
+131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −133%	180−190 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −120%	100−110 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −131%	90−95 +131%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −119%	130−140 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −58.9%	220−230 +58.9%
Hitman 3	45−50 −146%	110−120 +146%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −96.4%	210−220 +96.4%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −86.6%	150−160 +86.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −83.9%	110−120 +83.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −186%	220−230 +186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −45.5%	140−150 +45.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −133%	180−190 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −120%	100−110 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −131%	90−95 +131%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −119%	130−140 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −58.9%	220−230 +58.9%
Hitman 3	45−50 −146%	110−120 +146%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −96.4%	210−220 +96.4%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −86.6%	150−160 +86.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −83.9%	110−120 +83.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −186%	220−230 +186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −45.5%	140−150 +45.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −120%	100−110 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −131%	90−95 +131%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −58.9%	220−230 +58.9%
Hitman 3	45−50 −146%	110−120 +146%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −96.4%	210−220 +96.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −330%	344 +330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −223%	168 +223%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −45.5%	140−150 +45.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−83.9%

110−120
+83.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −173%	120−130 +173%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −147%	85−90 +147%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −200%	65−70 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −139%	65−70 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −98.5%	270−280 +98.5%
Hitman 3	27−30 −189%	80−85 +189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −178%	130−140 +178%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −388%	249 +388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −231%	95−100 +231%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −68.4%	220−230 +68.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−145%

95−100
+145%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −178%	60−65 +178%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −200%	50−55 +200%
Hitman 3	18−20 −153%	45−50 +153%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −77.2%	210−220 +77.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −207%	80−85 +207%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −346%	116 +346%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −214%	40−45 +214%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −167%	85−90 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −352%	131 +352%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −200%	30−35 +200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−167%

55−60
+167%

This is how Arc A550M and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

RX 7900M is 151% faster in 1080p
RX 7900M is 148% faster in 1440p
RX 7900M is 160% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 388% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7900M surpassed Arc A550M in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.51	58.37
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	180 Watt

Arc A550M has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 138.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.