Radeon RX 550 vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with Radeon RX 550, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
18.14
+157%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms RX 550 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking284519
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.05
ArchitectureXe LPGGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPULexa
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)20 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79
Current priceno data$121 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speedno data1100 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1183 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data37.86
Floating-point performanceno data1,211 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Radeon RX 550 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data7000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+186%
14−16
−186%
1440p16
+167%
6−7
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+150%
35−40
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+142%
30−35
−142%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+154%
55−60
−154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+157%
35−40
−157%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+157%
37
−157%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+145%
45−50
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
Hitman 3 90−95
+150%
35−40
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+142%
33
−142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+141%
55−60
−141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+150%
55−60
−150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+150%
35−40
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+142%
30−35
−142%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+154%
55−60
−154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+157%
35−40
−157%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+143%
35
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+145%
45−50
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
Hitman 3 90−95
+150%
35−40
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+141%
27
−141%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+146%
60−65
−146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+141%
55−60
−141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+156%
43
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+150%
55−60
−150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+150%
35−40
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+142%
30−35
−142%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+154%
55−60
−154%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+142%
33
−142%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+145%
45−50
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+139%
23
−139%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+150%
55−60
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+139%
21−24
−139%
Hitman 3 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+157%
35−40
−157%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+142%
30−35
−142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+150%
35−40
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Hitman 3 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+135%
16−18
−135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+140%
24−27
−140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and RX 550 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 186% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 167% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.14 7.06
Recency 14 December 2023 20 April 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX 550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
AMD Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5872 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.