Radeon 880M vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with Radeon 880M, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
17.52

Radeon 880M outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking308256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data139.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+17.6%
34
−17.6%
1440p16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Far Cry 5 37
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−14%
130−140
+14%
Hitman 3 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
+313%
8−9
−313%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+211%
27−30
−211%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Far Cry 5 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−14%
130−140
+14%
Hitman 3 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+238%
8−9
−238%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+378%
9−10
−378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+211%
27−30
−211%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Far Cry 5 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−14%
130−140
+14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+156%
9−10
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 18% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 880M is 13% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 1750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is ahead in 15 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.52 21.15
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

Radeon 880M has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon 880M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 59 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.