GeForce GTX 460 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Aggregated performance score

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
14.05
+140%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms GeForce GTX 460 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking346559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.98
Architectureno dataFermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (3 years ago)12 July 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current priceno data$128 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8336
Core clock speed1278 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data37.80
Floating-point performanceno data907.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 460 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Heightno data4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data6-pin & 6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data3600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data86.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+180%
10−12
−180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Hitman 3 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Hitman 3 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Hitman 3 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Hitman 3 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GTX 460 compete in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 180% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.05 5.85
Recency 10 November 2020 12 July 2010
Chip lithography 5 nm 40 nm

The Apple M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 460 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTX 460

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 881 vote

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 927 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.