Radeon 8065S vs TITAN RTX

Place in the ranking	94	85
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.50	no data
Power efficiency	12.52	65.77
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)
GPU code name	TU102	Gorgon Halo
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 December 2018 (7 years ago)	28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	2560
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	18.6 billion	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	480.0
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	288	160
Tensor Cores	576	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	40
L0 Cache	no data	1.3 MB
L1 Cache	4.5 MB	1 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	2 MB
L3 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.9	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
CUDA	7.5	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 44.98

Radeon 8065S 46.41
+3.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
Samples: 285

Radeon 8065S 19454
+3.2%

Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	161 +0.6%	160−170
1440p	102 +2%	100−110
4K	73	75−80 +2.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	15.52	no data
1440p	24.50	no data
4K	34.23	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	353 +40.6%	250−260
Cyberpunk 2077	79	110−120 +43%
Hogwarts Legacy	167 +45.2%	110−120
Resident Evil 4 Remake	202 +51.9%	130−140

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	163 +10.1%	140−150
Counter-Strike 2	342 +36.3%	250−260
Cyberpunk 2077	79	110−120 +43%
Far Cry 5	165 +11.5%	140−150
Fortnite	169	200−210 +19.5%
Forza Horizon 4	187 +3.3%	180−190
Hogwarts Legacy	145 +26.1%	110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	202 +18.8%	170−180
Valorant	348 +28.4%	270−280

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	164 +10.8%	140−150
Counter-Strike 2	270 +7.6%	250−260
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	270−280
Cyberpunk 2077	79	110−120 +43%
Dota 2	155 +3.3%	150−160
Far Cry 5	156 +5.4%	140−150
Fortnite	176	200−210 +14.8%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +2.8%	180−190
Grand Theft Auto V	152 +4.1%	140−150
Hogwarts Legacy	117 +1.7%	110−120
Metro Exodus	134 +16.5%	110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	163	170−180 +4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	267 +46.7%	180−190
Valorant	336 +24%	270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	160 +8.1%	140−150
Cyberpunk 2077	78	110−120 +44.9%
Dota 2	148	150−160 +1.4%
Far Cry 5	146	140−150 +1.4%
Forza Horizon 4	175	180−190 +3.4%
Hogwarts Legacy	94	110−120 +22.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	136	170−180 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139	180−190 +30.9%
Valorant	236	240−250 +1.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

134

200−210
+50.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	157 +22.7%	120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	300−350	300−350 +3.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	114 +14%	100−105
Metro Exodus	85 +18.1%	70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	180−190 +2.9%
Valorant	307	300−350 +0.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120	110−120 +2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +11.9%	55−60
Far Cry 5	134 +14.5%	110−120
Forza Horizon 4	157 +10.6%	140−150
Hogwarts Legacy	69 +19%	55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95	95−100 +4.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

120−130

120−130
+4%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	45	55−60 +28.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +21.8%	110−120
Hogwarts Legacy	30−33	30−33
Metro Exodus	55 +22.2%	45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +28.8%	80−85
Valorant	300 +5.6%	280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	97 +26%	75−80
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +1.8%	55−60
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +22.2%	27−30
Dota 2	146	150−160 +2.7%
Far Cry 5	80 +19.4%	65−70
Forza Horizon 4	114 +17.5%	95−100
Hogwarts Legacy	38 +22.6%	30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	96 +31.5%	70−75

4K
Epic

Fortnite

74
+12.1%

65−70

This is how TITAN RTX and Radeon 8065S compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 1% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 2% faster in 1440p
Radeon 8065S is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the TITAN RTX is 52% faster.
in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 51% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

TITAN RTX performs better in 38 tests (66%)
Radeon 8065S performs better in 19 tests (33%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.98	46.41
Recency	18 December 2018	28 September 2026
Chip lithography	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	55 Watt

Radeon 8065S has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN RTX and Radeon 8065S.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 8065S is a notebook one.