Radeon 8065S vs GeForce RTX 2080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2060 2060 12 GB 2060 Super 2060 TU104 2070 2070 Super 2080 2080 Super 2080 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
820M 840M 860M 880M 890M 8065S RX 8040S RX 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 with Radeon 8065S, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080
2018, $699
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
44.38

8065S outperforms RTX 2080 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 2080 RTX 2080
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.28no data
Power efficiency16.0765.83
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTU104Gorgon Halo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2018 (8 years ago)28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29442560
Core clock speed1515 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate314.6480.0
Floating-point processing power10.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6464
TMUs184160
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores4640
L0 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L1 Cache2.9 MB1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2080 44.38
Radeon 8065S 46.51
+4.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 18567
Samples: 12154
Radeon 8065S 19456
+4.8%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD144150−160
+4.2%
1440p101
+1%
100−110
4K7375−80
+2.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.85no data
1440p6.92no data
4K9.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 130−140 140−150
+5.1%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 250−260
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 110−120
+5.6%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130 130−140
+5.6%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 130−140 140−150
+5.1%
Battlefield 5 163
+10.1%
140−150
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 250−260
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 110−120
+5.6%
Far Cry 5 117 140−150
+26.5%
Fortnite 199 200−210
+1.5%
Forza Horizon 4 156 180−190
+16%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 209
+22.9%
170−180
Valorant 263 270−280
+3%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 130−140 140−150
+5.1%
Battlefield 5 155
+4.7%
140−150
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 250−260
+3.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 110−120
+5.6%
Dota 2 140−150 150−160
+0.7%
Far Cry 5 112 140−150
+32.1%
Fortnite 173 200−210
+16.8%
Forza Horizon 4 153 180−190
+18.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 131 140−150
+11.5%
Metro Exodus 90 110−120
+28.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 188
+10.6%
170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181 180−190
+0.6%
Valorant 254 270−280
+6.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 145 140−150
+2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 110−120
+5.6%
Dota 2 140−150 150−160
+0.7%
Far Cry 5 106 140−150
+39.6%
Forza Horizon 4 132 180−190
+37.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169 170−180
+0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106 180−190
+71.7%
Valorant 223 230−240
+3.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 156 200−210
+29.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
+6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
+5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100 100−105
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 60 70−75
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 247 300−350
+25.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 125
+7.8%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 55−60
+7.3%
Far Cry 5 99 110−120
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 118 140−150
+20.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 95−100
+6.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 128 120−130
+0.8%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
+5.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 107 110−120
+2.8%
Metro Exodus 39 45−50
+15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76 80−85
+5.3%
Valorant 234 280−290
+21.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 76 75−80
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 27−30
+3.8%
Dota 2 120−130
+1.7%
120−130
Far Cry 5 59 65−70
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 4 81 95−100
+19.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69 70−75
+5.8%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65 65−70
+1.5%

This is how RTX 2080 and Radeon 8065S compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S is 4% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 is 1% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8065S is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 is 23% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 72% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 performs better in 5 tests (9%)
  • Radeon 8065S performs better in 49 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.38 46.51
Recency 20 September 2018 28 September 2026
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 55 Watt

Radeon 8065S has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 74% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 and Radeon 8065S.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 8065S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
vs
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
R5 A240 AMD Radeon R5 A240
vs
Tesla P10 Tesla P10
RTX 2080 NVIDIA RTX 2080
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q 2060 Max-Q
RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
vs
Arc A530M Arc A530M
RTX 2080 NVIDIA RTX 2080
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile 3050 A Mobile
RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
vs
Arc B370 Arc B370
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
L40 L40
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
H100 PCIe 96 GB PCIe 96 GB
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 2722 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 or Radeon 8065S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.