Ryzen 3 3300U vs Xeon X5670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.94
+6.2%

Xeon X5670 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13711405
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeon (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67no data
Current price$45 (0.7x MSRP)$634

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support6400 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size239 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size288 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5670 3.94
+6.2%
Ryzen 3 3300U 3.71

Xeon X5670 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5670 6089
+6.1%
Ryzen 3 3300U 5739

Xeon X5670 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by 6% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon X5670 3698
Ryzen 3 3300U 4280
+15.7%

Ryzen 3 3300U outperforms Xeon X5670 by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon X5670 19954
+61.5%
Ryzen 3 3300U 12357

Xeon X5670 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by 61% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon X5670 5794
+33.7%
Ryzen 3 3300U 4332

Xeon X5670 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by 34% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.94 3.71
Recency 16 March 2010 6 January 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U.

Be aware that Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
Ryzen 3 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 464 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 210 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5670 or Ryzen 3 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.