Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon X5670

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1373	1387
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.06	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	Xeon (Desktop)	AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codename	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date	16 March 2010 (14 years ago)	8 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$67	no data
Current price	$44 (0.7x MSRP)	$718

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	12	4
Base clock speed	2.93 GHz	2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.33 GHz	3.5 GHz
Bus support	6400 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	384 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	2 MB
L3 cache	12 MB (shared)	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Die size	239 mm2	209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature	81 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,170 million	4940 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA1366,LGA1366	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	40 Bit	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size	288 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5670 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.94	3.86
Recency	16 March 2010	8 April 2019
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	12	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---