Intel Xeon Gold 6354 vs W-3275M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Xeon W-3275M
25.15

Gold 6354 outperforms W-3275M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking165149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.3121.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years old)6 April 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data
Current price$9030 (1.2x MSRP)$2224
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6354 has 834% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Technical specs

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads5636
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB39 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.15
Xeon Gold 6354 26.98
+7.3%

Gold 6354 outperforms W-3275M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3275M 38622
Xeon Gold 6354 41445
+7.3%

Gold 6354 outperforms W-3275M by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 25.15 26.98
Recency 3 June 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 28 18
Threads 56 36
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 6354
Xeon Gold 6354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 62 votes

Rate Intel Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Gold 6354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Xeon Gold 6354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.