Xeon Gold 6416H vs W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.35
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
25.56
+0.8%

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms Xeon W-3275M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking201196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.0749.40
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.7014.66
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$1,444

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6416H has 874% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads5636
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB45 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.35
Xeon Gold 6416H 25.56
+0.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 40261
Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.35 25.56
Recency 3 June 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 28 18
Threads 56 36
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has 55.6% more physical cores and 55.6% more threads.

Xeon Gold 6416H, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 24.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6416H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon Gold 6416H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Xeon Gold 6416H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.