Xeon Silver 4309Y vs W-3275M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019, $7,453
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
22.82
+113%
Xeon Silver 4309Y
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
10.73

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Xeon Silver 4309Y by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking296854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.57no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency4.704.32
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size2 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3275M 22.82
+113%
Xeon Silver 4309Y 10.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39983
+113%
Samples: 36
Xeon Silver 4309Y 18791
Samples: 11

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3275M 1176
Xeon Silver 4309Y 1242
+5.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3275M 11951
+69.5%
Xeon Silver 4309Y 7051

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.82 10.73
Recency 3 June 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 112.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4309Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 95.2% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Xeon Silver 4309Y

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4309Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4309Y, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.