Apple M1 Max vs Xeon W-3275M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads
25.34
+115%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Apple M1 Max by a whopping 115% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking168598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.43no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WApple M-Series
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data
Current price$9030 (1.2x MSRP)$8.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads5610
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.75 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache28 MB28 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.34
+115%
Apple M1 Max 11.78

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Apple M1 Max by 115% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3275M 39197
+78%
Apple M1 Max 22023

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Apple M1 Max by 78% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.34 11.78
Recency 3 June 2019 18 October 2021
Physical cores 28 10
Threads 56 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Max in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 62 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 662 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.