Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD EPYC 7643
Comparing Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Information on Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643 technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643.
Various benchmark results of Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario.
Let's see how good Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3275M
Higher boost clock speed (2500 vs 2300 MHz)
Lower power consumption (205 vs 225 watts)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology - protects the system against viruses and rootkits residing in BIOS or in a boot sector)
vPro (a marketing umbrella term for several Intel technologies: AMT, TXT, EDB, VT, Anti-Theft and some others)
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7643
95.3% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (15 March 2021 vs 3 June 2019)
Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 14 nm)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
So, Xeon W-3275M or EPYC 7643?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD EPYC 7643.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7643, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.