Xeon W3505 vs 5160

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads
0.63
Xeon W3505
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.76
+20.6%

W3505 outperforms 5160 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26372524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.155.10
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release dateJune 2006 (17 years old)March 2009 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$22no data
Current price$88 (4x MSRP)$654
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W3505 has 137% better value for money than Xeon 5160.

Technical specs

Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.53 GHz
L1 cache0 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data263 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V0.8V-1.225V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA7711366
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-+
PAE32 Bit36 Bit
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data24 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.63
Xeon W3505 0.76
+20.6%

W3505 outperforms 5160 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon 5160 963
Xeon W3505 1161
+20.6%

W3505 outperforms 5160 by 21% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.63 0.76
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 130 Watt

The Xeon W3505 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Xeon W3505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Xeon W3505
Xeon W3505

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Intel Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Intel Xeon W3505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Xeon W3505, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.