Xeon 5148 vs W3505

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W3505
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.75
+27.1%

W3505 outperforms 5148 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25262660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.103.05
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Woodcrest (2006)
Release dateMarch 2009 (15 years ago)June 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9
Current price$654 $32 (3.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W3505 has 67% better value for money than Xeon 5148.

Technical specs

Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.33 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.8V-1.225Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1366771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3505 0.75
+27.1%
Xeon 5148 0.59

W3505 outperforms 5148 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3505 1161
+27.3%
Xeon 5148 912

W3505 outperforms 5148 by 27% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.75 0.59
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 40 Watt

The Xeon W3505 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5148 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3505 and Xeon 5148, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3505
Xeon W3505
Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W3505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3505 or Xeon 5148, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.