Celeron 925 vs Turion Neo X2 L625

Place in the ranking	3141	3115
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	2x AMD Turion Neo	no data
Power efficiency	1.42	0.81
Architecture codename	Congo (2009)	no data
Release date	1 October 2009 (15 years ago)	1 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	no data
Threads	2	no data
Base clock speed	no data	2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	no data
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	no data
L3 cache	no data	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	ASB1 BGA	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection	no data
VirusProtect	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-

Security technologies

Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion Neo X2 L625 0.27

Celeron 925 0.30
+11.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion Neo X2 L625 432

Celeron 925 477
+10.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.27	0.30
Recency	1 October 2009	1 January 2011
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt

Turion Neo X2 L625 has 94.4% lower power consumption.

Celeron 925, on the other hand, has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 925 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion Neo X2 L625 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.