Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Turion 64 ML-40
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms Turion 64 ML-40 by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 ML-40 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3210 | 2974 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 0.57 | 1.16 |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 ML-40 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-40 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 0.43 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has a 104.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-40 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-40 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
