Celeron N6211 vs Pentium M 725
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2092 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.60 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Pentium M | Elkhart Lake |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Elkhart Lake |
Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $54 |
Current price | $23 | $240 (4.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
Bus support | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 84 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | PPGA478 | BGA1493 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron N6211 outperforms Pentium M 725 by 93% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium M 725 is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.