Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs FX-4320

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1815	2031
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.00	2.80
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	Core 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)	no data
Current price	$53	$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4320 has 43% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9550.

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	2.83 GHz
Bus support	no data	1333 MHz
L1 cache	192 KB	no data
L2 cache	4096 KB	12288 KB
L3 cache	4096 KB	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	315 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM3+	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3-1866

DDR1,DDR2,DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550.

PCIe version

Not Listed

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.01	1.51
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---