Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs FX-8320E

General info

Comparing FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1495	2020
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.91	2.80
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	Core 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date	2 September 2014 (9 years ago)	no data
Current price	$140	$54

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Quad Q9550 has 208% better value for money than FX-8320E.

Technical specs

FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	2.83 GHz
Bus support	no data	1333 MHz
L2 cache	8192 KB	12288 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	315 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM3+	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR1,DDR2,DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550.

PCIe version

n/a

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 113% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	3.21	1.51
Physical cores	8	4
Threads	8	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---