Pentium G4400TE vs E2-3000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Pentium G4400TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.38
+229%

Pentium G4400TE outperforms E2-3000M by a whopping 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29872237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.133.73
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date20 December 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm298.57 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380Gno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6380GIntel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000M 0.42
Pentium G4400TE 1.38
+229%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
Pentium G4400TE 2190
+228%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 1.38
Integrated graphics card 0.52 1.61
Recency 20 December 2011 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

Pentium G4400TE has a 228.6% higher aggregate performance score, 209.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium G4400TE is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Pentium G4400TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
Intel Pentium G4400TE
Pentium G4400TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium G4400TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or Pentium G4400TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.