Pentium G4400TE vs Turion 64 X2 TL-66
Aggregate performance score
Pentium G4400TE outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-66 by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3033 | 2236 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 1.03 | 3.73 |
| Architecture codename | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 13 April 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $64 |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 98.57 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1750 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | LGA-1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.38 | 1.38 |
| Recency | 13 April 2007 | 1 September 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Pentium G4400TE has a 263.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Pentium G4400TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-66 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-66 and Pentium G4400TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
