Pentium G4400TE vs A10-9600P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9600P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.51
+6.3%

A10-9600P outperforms Pentium G4400TE by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20502118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64
Current price$494 no data

Detailed specifications

A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm298.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8no data
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
AVXno data+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 510
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9600P 1.51
+6.3%
Pentium G4400TE 1.42

A10-9600P outperforms Pentium G4400TE by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9600P 2343
+7%
Pentium G4400TE 2190

A10-9600P outperforms Pentium G4400TE by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 1.42
Recency 1 June 2016 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9600P and Pentium G4400TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9600P
A10-9600P
Intel Pentium G4400TE
Pentium G4400TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 303 votes

Rate A10-9600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium G4400TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9600P or Pentium G4400TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.