HD Graphics 510: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.37% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

Intel started HD Graphics 510 sales 1 September 2015. This is a Gen. 9 Skylake architecture notebook card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x1 interface. Power consumption is at 15 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about HD Graphics 510: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking966
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Value for money0.04
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1
Market segmentLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$476 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

HD Graphics 510's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of HD Graphics 510's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed300 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed950 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors189 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology14 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate11.40of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance182.4 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 510's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on HD Graphics 510: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount32 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width64/128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Shared memory+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on HD Graphics 510. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by HD Graphics 510. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+

API support

APIs supported by HD Graphics 510, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL2.1
Vulkan1.1.97

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of HD Graphics 510. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 510 1.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 510 625

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 510 3798

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 510 847

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 510 621

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 510 5664

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

HD Graphics 510 43274

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

HD Graphics 510 9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good HD Graphics 510 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
Hitman 3 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
Hitman 3 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
Hitman 3 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Hitman 3 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6

Relative performance

Overall HD Graphics 510 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


HD Graphics 510 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

HD Graphics 515HDGraphics 515
Compare
HD Graphics 5000HDGraphics 5000
Compare
HD 8650GRadeon HD8650G
Compare
R5 M255Radeon R5M255
Compare
HD Graphics 4400HDGraphics 4400
Compare
HD 8670MRadeon HD8670M
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with HD Graphics 510 according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3 317 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about HD Graphics 510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.