Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-11370H
Aggregate performance score
i7-11370H outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 936 | 1679 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 45 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Jasper Lake |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $426 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 320 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 5 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 146.1 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1449 | BGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.56 | 2.64 |
| Integrated graphics card | 9.44 | 1.33 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-11370H has a 186.4% higher aggregate performance score, 609.8% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.
Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-11370H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i7-11370H is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-11370H and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
