Celeron G3900E vs Core i3-7102E

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads
1.63
+23.5%
Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads
1.32

Core i3-7102E outperforms Celeron G3900E by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19572135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.12
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years old)2 January 2016 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$107
Current priceno data$135 (1.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Number of transistorsno data1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.63
+23.5%
Celeron G3900E 1.32

Core i3-7102E outperforms Celeron G3900E by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-7102E 2521
+23.9%
Celeron G3900E 2034

Core i3-7102E outperforms Celeron G3900E by 24% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.63 1.32
Integrated graphics card 3.09 1.37
Recency 3 January 2017 2 January 2016
Threads 4 2
Cost $225 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

The Core i3-7102E is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and Celeron G3900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or Celeron G3900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.