Turion 64 ML-30 vs Celeron M 575
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 575 outperforms Turion 64 ML-30 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3165 | 3289 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.43 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M 575 has a 56.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 12.9% lower power consumption.
The Celeron M 575 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-30 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
