Celeron G6900 vs J1800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data
Current price$253 (3.5x MSRP)$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency792 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1800 572
Celeron G6900 4557
+697%

G6900 outperforms J1800 by 697% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 4 January 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 46 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 480 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 156 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Celeron G6900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.