Celeron N2840 vs J1800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)22 May 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data
Current price$253 (3.5x MSRP)$287

Technical specs

Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cache112 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency792 MHz792 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1800 572
Celeron N2840 587
+2.6%

N2840 outperforms J1800 by 3% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 November 2013 22 May 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 472 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 558 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.