A6-3650 vs Celeron G3900E

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and A6-3650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2141	2137
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.12	5.42
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake (2015−2016)	Llano (2011−2012)
Release date	2 January 2016 (8 years ago)	30 June 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data
Current price	$135 (1.3x MSRP)	$25

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-3650 has 4417% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed Specifications

Celeron G3900E and A6-3650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	no data	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm	228 mm2
Number of transistors	1750 Million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and A6-3650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	FM1
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and A6-3650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and A6-3650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and A6-3650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	LPDDR3-1866	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.134 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics 510

Radeon HD 6530D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and A6-3650.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	2 January 2016	30 June 2011
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	100 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and A6-3650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---