Athlon 64 FX-62 vs Atom x5-E8000
Aggregated performance score
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a small 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2664 | 2638 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.24 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 5x Intel Atom | Athlon 64 (Desktop) |
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail (2016) | Windsor (2006−2009) |
| Release date | 8 February 2016 (8 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39 | no data |
| Current price | $340 (8.7x MSRP) | $28 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.04 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 1000 MHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 5% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 26% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.61 | 0.64 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 125 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62.
Be aware that Atom x5-E8000 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E8000 and Athlon 64 FX-62, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
