Atom x5-E8000 vs A6 Pro-7050B

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6 Pro-7050B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads
0.65
+6.6%
Atom x5-E8000
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.61

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26202658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Kaveri5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date4 June 2014 (9 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39
Current priceno data$340 (8.7x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.04 GHz
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
iGPU core count3no data
Number of pipelines192no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6 Pro-7050B 0.65
+6.6%
Atom x5-E8000 0.61

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6 Pro-7050B 1009
+7%
Atom x5-E8000 943

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 7% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6 Pro-7050B 1820
+100%
Atom x5-E8000 910

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 100% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6 Pro-7050B 2930
Atom x5-E8000 3219
+9.9%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms A6 Pro-7050B by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6 Pro-7050B 1468
Atom x5-E8000 1704
+16.1%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms A6 Pro-7050B by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6 Pro-7050B 47.98
Atom x5-E8000 34.57
+38.8%

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 39% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6 Pro-7050B 82
Atom x5-E8000 94
+15.3%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms A6 Pro-7050B by 15% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6 Pro-7050B 50
+83.3%
Atom x5-E8000 27

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 83% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6 Pro-7050B 0.6
+9.1%
Atom x5-E8000 0.6

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 9% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6 Pro-7050B 765
+30.1%
Atom x5-E8000 588

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 30% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6 Pro-7050B 33
Atom x5-E8000 37
+11.8%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms A6 Pro-7050B by 12% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6 Pro-7050B 6
Atom x5-E8000 8
+20%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms A6 Pro-7050B by 20% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.65 0.61
Recency 4 June 2014 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 5 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6 Pro-7050B and Atom x5-E8000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6 Pro-7050B
A6 Pro-7050B
Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 32 votes

Rate A6 Pro-7050B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 53 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A6 Pro-7050B or Atom x5-E8000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.