Celeron M 743 vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)Intel Celeron M
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA965
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 1639
+182%
Celeron M 743 582

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 743, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Celeron M 743. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is a desktop processor while Celeron M 743 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.