Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Athlon 64	Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codename	Sherman (2009)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	1 May 2009 (15 years ago)	1 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	2 GHz
Bus rate	667 MHz	800 MHz
L1 cache	0.1 MB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	S1g1	Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection	no data
VirusProtect	+	-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

+

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 May 2009	1 February 2010
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---