Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 29.43 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 40-core GPU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 7 January 2018 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
