Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | Apple M4 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U has 433.3% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
