AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Comparing A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
Information on A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)
A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
A6-9225 1.69 +4.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1.62
A6-9225 2132 +21.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1760
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
A6-9225 2532 +22.7%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 2063
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
A6-9225 4193 +2.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098
A6-9225 26 +46.5%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 39
A6-9225 1327 +4.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
Let's see how good A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A6-9225
4.3% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 June 2018 vs 26 September 2010)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 45 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 35 watts)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
Advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
Execute Disable Bit (allows marking some memory ranges as non-executable, thus protecting software against so-called "buffer overflow" attacks)
So, A6-9225 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A6-9225 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.