AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

AMD A6-9225
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

General info

Comparing A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
AMD Bristol Ridge
Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codename
Stoney Ridge
Release date
1 June 2018
26 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP)
no data

Technical specs

A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Bus support
no data
800 MHz
L1 cache
160 KB
128 KB
L2 cache
1 MB
1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
45 nm
Die size
124.5 mm2
107 mm2
Maximum core temperature
90 °C
no data
Transistor count
1200 Million
410 Million
64 bit support


Information on A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)
10-15 Watt
35 Watt

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)
no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A6-9225 1.69 +4.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1.62

3DMark06 CPU

A6-9225 2132 +21.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1760

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

A6-9225 2532 +22.7%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 2063

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

A6-9225 4193 +2.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098

wPrime 32

A6-9225 26 +46.5%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 39


A6-9225 1327 +4.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A6-9225

4.3% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 June 2018 vs 26 September 2010)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 45 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 35 watts)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)

Advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
Execute Disable Bit (allows marking some memory ranges as non-executable, thus protecting software against so-called "buffer overflow" attacks)

So, A6-9225 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A6-9225 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A6-9225
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as give your rating.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.