Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Ryzen 7 3700X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 3700X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads
14.59
+22.5%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking445588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Rembrandt-R
Release date7 July 2019 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data
Current price$212 (0.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3700X 14.59
+22.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.91

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 3700X 22573
+22.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18426

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 23% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 3700X 1655
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1726
+4.3%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 4% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 3700X 8103
+19.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6764

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 3700X 5839
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6257
+7.2%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 3700X 40439
+8.4%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 37321

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 3700X 13815
+12.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 12242

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 13% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 3700X 3.71
+126%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8.4

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 126% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 3700X 23
+15.1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 20

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 15% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3700X 2092
+19.1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1757

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3700X 204
Ryzen 5 7535HS 241
+18.1%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 18% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 3700X 2.3
Ryzen 5 7535HS 2.79
+21.3%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 21% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700X 11.4
+11.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 10.2

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 12% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700X 7503
+13.9%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6586

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 14% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700X 270
+4.4%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 258

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 4% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700X 115
+10.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 104

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 11% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.59 11.91
Recency 7 July 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7535HS in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 3700X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4817 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 710 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.