AMD A6-9220 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

AMD A6-9220
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

General info

Comparing A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
Bristol Ridge
Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Achitecture codename
Stoney Ridge
Release date
1 June 2016
1 September 2009
Launch price (MSRP)

Technical specs

A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
2.9 GHz
1.2 GHz
800 MHz
L1 cache
160 KB
L2 cache
1 MB
1 MB
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
45 nm
Die size
124.5 mm2
107 mm2
Maximum core temperature
90 °C
Transistor count
1200 Million
410 Million
64 bit support


Information on A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
10-15 Watt
10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A6-9220 6.81
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 10.94 +60.6%

3DMark06 CPU

A6-9220 2253 +125.3%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

A6-9220 2432 +94.6%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

A6-9220 3941 +65.6%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A6-9220

Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 1 September 2009)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 45 nm)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)

Advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

60.6% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests
Speedstep (saves battery charge by managing an Intel CPU frequency and voltage in realtime)
Thermal Monitoring Technologies

So, A6-9220 or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A6-9220
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.