Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs A6-9220

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80
+167%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30

A6-9220 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26103108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency5.022.82
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGABGA956
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220 0.80
+167%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9220 1278
+165%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-9220 2432
+94.6%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-9220 3941
+65.6%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-9220 2253
+125%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.30
Recency 1 June 2016 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

A6-9220 has a 166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-9220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220
A6-9220
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 403 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.